HOME | ABOUT | SIGN UP FOR EMAILS
Overpopulation is an ecological term describing populations of organisms, including humans, exceeding the carrying capacity of their ecosystems.
What does it mean to say that our species has exceeded the carrying capacity of the planet? The most telling criterion is that today humanity, one species among millions, uses half of Earth's ice-free surface to grow food and has demolished marine life abundance by over-extraction of sea life and destruction of habitats. As a result, Earth's ecosystems and wildlife are in freefall, while contamination by industrial civilization burgeons. Both these woes, ecological devastation and global toxification, continue to spiral planetary health out of bounds. Overpopulation – sheer numbers of people – is a major factor behind them.
Exceeding carrying capacity is not only connected to human numbers but to how much humanity chooses to consume. For the most part, humanity has opted for a modern lifestyle, which is inherently hyper-consumptive, what with its burgeoning commodities, amenities, technologies, mobility, and interconnectivity. While the excesses and inequality of this lifestyle need to be corrected, human numbers must also be lowered if we want to preempt the modern way of life from causing ecocide, which commits flagrant injustice to the nonhuman world and will bequeath all posterity with an impoverished planet. A number of environmental scientists have argued that a sustainable global human population is in the ballpark of 2 to 3 billion people living equitably with each other and with all life on Earth.
In recent decades, however, the subject of human overpopulation has become taboo. The stigma around the subject arose following the association of overpopulation with perspectives that disproportionately blamed the world's high-fertility poor regions for the ecological crisis, some of which also led to coercive policies that violated human rights. While such perspectives and policies must be denounced, the scientific and ecological basis of the fact that we are overpopulated cannot be denied.
Population degrowth is achievable within a human-rights framework. Indeed, the term "overpopulation" can be reclaimed as a feminist concept. Seen through a lens of social justice, overpopulation is the result of pronatalism, driven by patriarchal forces that compel people, especially girls and women, to have children and large families regardless of their authentic preference. Pronatalism not only undermines reproductive choice but also the rights of children to be born into conditions conducive to their wellbeing – socially, materially, and ecologically. By countering pronatalism and empowering reproductive choice, motherhood (and parenthood) can be uplifted into a deliberate and mindful decision. We need to transform sociocultural norms worldwide, so that to have a child or children, or to remain childfree, are equally valid decisions, freely chosen. We also need to create a global community with zero tolerance for "child brides," and the egregious abuse and stunting of prospects that cultural practice perpetrates against girls.
Decades of demographic research show that when women achieve reproductive freedom and the means to regulate their fertility, they tend to have few or no children. Empowering girls and women, specifically by confronting harmful patriarchal and pronatalist norms, is the main pathway to a smaller global population that can enjoy a high quality life within an ecologically flourishing planet.
Overpopulation is a term describing excessive human presence that damages the natural world through overdraw and through enormous waste flows. Overpopulation is thus ecologically unjust. But it is also founded on social injustice, for it is driven by patriarchal pronatalist forces that pressure, or even coerce, girls and women to reproduce.
In brief, achieving a lower human population promises enormous existential benefits to nonhuman and human worlds alike.
* * * * *
For further reading, see the following:
Bajaj N and Stade K (2023) Challenging pronatalism is key to advancing reproductive rights and a sustainable population. Journal of Population and Sustainability 7(1): 39–70.
Rees W (2020) Ecological economics for humanity's plague phase. Ecological Economics 169: 106519.
Unsustainable development goals
Long article by Andrea Cardini [Vol 7 No 2 2024: 124–34]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Earth at the crossroads
Reflection by Phoebe Barnard [Vol 6 No 2 2023: 111–16]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Remembering a father tree: A tribute to Dave Foreman (1946–2022)
In memoriam by John Davis [Vol 6 No 1 2023: 77–80]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Don’t confuse a symptom with the problem: Overpopulation, not climate change, is the real emergency
Reflection by Madeline Weld [Vol 5 No 1 2021: 29–32]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Got nitrogen? On the links between nitrogen pollution and overpopulation
Editorial by Eileen Crist [Vol 5 No 1 2021: 3–10]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Just population policies for an overpopulated world
Long article by Phil Cafaro [Vol 5 No 1 2021: 55–64]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Overpopulation denial syndrome
Reflection by Robin Maynard [Vol 5 No 1 2021: 23–8]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
The moral imperative to reduce global population
Long article by Trevor Hedberg [Vol 5 No 1 2021: 47–54]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
The most ethical gift: Towards a sustainable demographic future
Opinion by Joe Bish [Vol 5 No 1 2021: 14–15]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
My choice to go child-free for the sake of all life
Opinion by Sally Tan [Vol 4 No 1 2020: 7]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Against steady-state economics
Long article by Troy Vettese [Vol 3 Suppl B 2020: 35–46]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Nature needs half: Implications for population, consumption and inequality in the ‘other half’
Long article by Gregory M Mikkelson [Vol 3 Suppl A 2019: 87–91]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Against piety: The planet, the Pope and Laudato Si’
Snapshot by Ray Keenoy [Vol 3 No 1 2019: 27–9]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
How should ecological citizens think about immigration?
Long article by Phil Cafaro and Jane O'Sullivan [Vol 3 No 1 2019: 85–92]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Decoupling the global population problem from immigration issues
Reflection by Eileen Crist [Vol 2 No 2 2019: 149–51]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Immigration and population: The interlinked ecological crisis that dares not speak its name
Long article by Colin Hines [Vol 2 No 1 2018: 51–5]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
‘Any size population will do?’: The fallacy of aiming for stabilization of human numbers
Long article by Karin Kuhlemann [Vol 1 No 2 2018: 181–9]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Interview with Paul Ehrlich
Interview with Paul R Ehrlich [Vol 1 No 2 2018: 154–5]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Learning for biosphere security in a crowded, warming world
Long article by Alexander Lautensach [Vol 1 No 2 2018: 171–8]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
The Ecological Citizen: An impulse of life, for life
Editorial by Patrick Curry [Vol 1 No 1 2017: 5–9]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Reasons for a reduction of humans’ impact on the ecosphere
Opinion by Joe Gray [Vol 1 No 1 2017: 17–18]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS