HOME | ABOUT | SIGN UP FOR EMAILS
Animal rights is the claim that animals - not just humans - possess 'rights'. A right is an inalienable power or entitlement (a right to do something), or an immunity (a right not to have something done to one) that is lodged in an individual. Such rights are conceived of as existing outside of, or prior to, existing legal systems, and thus as providing a means to critique existing laws. Animal rights is the claim that animals possess a range of such rights simply in virtue of being sentient, or 'subjects of a life'. They assume, as an axiom, that it is wrong to cause pain, suffering or disruption to any living creature.
Many ecocentrists, those who respect both the Earth, herself, and all life, accept this conviction, and, despite it being possible to find contradictions, they regard all living life forms, no matter what that form may be, as being valuable, both to themselves and to the Earth in general. Also, it is realized that all living entities are subjects, not objects. This creates various rights for living entities including animals. Animal rights are thus a subclass of the rights of all life in general.
Additionally, the sum total of a group of like animals constitutes a species, which is also recognized as valuable by an ecocentrist; the interests of a species sometimes conflict with the animal rights of its constituent individuals, which can, and does, create tensions.
The concerns for the welfare, and rights, of both species and their constituent individuals are fully justified. They fully support the position that it is wrong to cause pain, suffering or disruption to any living creature and also wrong to diminish or to extinguish the species of which the individual is a member. While it is impossible to live and do no harm, doing least harm is a valid goal.
As a corollary, human rights, other than strictly inter-human ones, are invalid, and loaded with anthropocentric bias, unless they extend, in appropriate and divergent ways, to all life. For instance, all life has a right to scarce water, food and habitat, not just the humans of an area.
Killing barred owls to save spotted owls is the lesser of two evils
Long article by Dominick A DellaSala [Vol 8 No 1 2025: epub-118-1 to 10]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Reptiles: Misunderstood, maligned and mistreated
Long article by Enrique Font [Vol 8 No 1 2025: epub-123-1 to 9]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Covenant with the wild: A critique of the ‘right to roam’ movement
Long article by Simon Leadbeater [Vol 7 No 1 2024: 72–80]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
All that breathes: An exploration of inter-species intimacy
Film review by Deborah Dutta [Vol 6 No 2 2023: 162–4]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Is there moral justification to eat meat?
Long article by Gregory F Tague [Vol 6 No 1 2023: 60–5]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Sentience in invertebrates: A report on a two-part webinar
Meeting report by Joe Gray [Vol 5 No 2 2022: 201–9]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Suffer the animals
Editorial by Eileen Crist [Vol 4 No 2 2021: 101–2]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Beyond the North American Wildlife Conservation Model and towards Earth rights
Long article by Anja Heister [Vol 3 Suppl A 2019: 67–74]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
In defence of tears
Reflection by Simon Leadbeater [Vol 3 Suppl A 2019: 101–3]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
The silence of the humpback whale
Long article by Kathleen Dean Moore [Vol 3 Suppl A 2019: 7–11]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Holistic versus individualistic non-anthropocentrism
Opinion by Gregory M Mikkelson [Vol 2 No 2 2019: 137–8]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Eating animals: An ecocentric perspective
Long article by Rob Percival [Vol 2 No 1 2018: 33–9]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Ethical responsibilities in invasion biology
Reflection by Emily C Parke and James C Russell [Vol 2 No 1 2018: 17–19]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS
Why I’m vegan
Opinion by Michael Anderson [Vol 2 No 1 2018: 15–16]
ACCESS PDF | MORE DETAILS